Winery Limited Partnership Litigation (Cal. Super. Ct., Sonoma Cty.)
THE FURTH FIRM LLP was lead counsel in this securities fraud case brought
on behalf of a nationwide class of investors in limited partnerships
formed to purchase and operate wineries. The case has been settled
favorably to the class.
Telecommunications Litigation (Texas Dist.Ct., Jefferson Cty.)
Utilizing its substantial telecommunications experience in local
exchange market issues, THE FURTH FIRM LLP successfully settled a class
action contract case in which it was co-lead counsel on behalf of a
class of 57 Texas municipalities. The case involved enforcement of the
cities' franchise ordinances providing for the payment of fees for the
use of the streets.
Industrial Revenue Bond Litigation (D. Ariz.).
THE FURTH FIRM LLP represented the plaintiff class in a securities fraud
class action by purchasers of industrial revenue bonds that were
intended to finance the development of a residential care facility and
nursing home. The case was settled on a favorable basis, against most
of the defendants, along with a related case involving a separate, but
similar bond issue.
Mortgage Fund Limited Partnership Litigation (D. Ariz.)
This was a securities fraud class action by purchasers of limited
partnership interests in blind pool mortgage funds. The complaint
alleged an elaborate ponzi scheme whereby monies obtained from
investors were used to pay distributions to investors in prior limited
partnerships. THE FURTH FIRM LLP represented the plaintiff class, which was
certified. This case settled while summary judgment motions were
pending.
Real Estate Limited Partnership Litigation (N.D. Tex.)
In a securities fraud class action by purchasers of interests in 121
limited real estate partnerships, THE FURTH FIRM LLP, together with two
other counsel, represented the class. The district court's opinions
granting class certification and denying summary judgment are highly
favorable to securities plaintiffs and deal with a host of important
issues, such as classwide proof of reliance and causation, typicality
of claims, statutes of limitations, scienter and materiality. The case
was settled favorably for our clients.
Back to Top